Hybridization in turn can play a role in the fitness of a species .Below is a simulation I generated for a 200 individual population of rainbow trout on the left and a 50 individual population of cutthroat trout on the right. The graphs show the change in genotype and allele frequency over 200 generations.
200 rainbow trouts 50 cutthroat trouts
From the graphs it's evident that with the smaller population of cutthroat trout had a lot more fluctuation in genotypes while the rainbow trout genotypes were much more stable.
200 rainbow trout 50 cutthroat trout
These graphs show the negative impact hybridization has on the native population of cutthroat trout as they are being predated. While the genotype and allele frequency for the rainbow trout did vary over time their change are very different from the cutthroat population. At around generation 80 the aa genotype was at carrying capacity while the AA genotype was non existent. For allele frequency, it was also not evident at generation 80.
From these simulations and the graph I found through my research it is clear that hybridization does negatively impact the cutthroat trout that are found in their native habitat.
No comments:
Post a Comment